Judge orders Trump to halt White House ballroom construction unless Congress OKs it
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:21 pmA federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to suspend its construction of a $400 million ballroom where it demolished the East Wing of the White House.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington granted a preservationist group’s request for a preliminary injunction that temporarily halts President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project.
Leon, who was nominated to the bench by Republican President George W. Bush, wrote, “I have concluded that the National Trust is likely to succeed on the merits because no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have.”
"The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!”
The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued for an order pausing the ballroom project until it undergoes multiple independent reviews and wins approval from Congress.
The White House announced the ballroom project over the summer. By late October, Trump had demolished the East Wing to make way for a ballroom that he said will fit 999 people. The White House said private donations, including from Trump himself, would pay for the planned construction of a 90,000-square-foot ballroom.
Related | Dumb and disturbing developments in Trump’s ballroom boondoggle
Trump proceeded with the project before seeking input from a pair of federal review panels, the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts. Trump has stocked both commission with allies.
Judge temporarily halts construction of Trump's White House ballroom
Mar. 31st, 2026 08:21 pmItalian Christmas meal tragedy turns into murder inquiry
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:52 pmRussian oil tanker docks in Cuba ending near-total blockade
Mar. 31st, 2026 12:51 pmEurovision Song Contest launches first-ever Asia edition
Mar. 31st, 2026 09:51 amThey Will Kill You Is a Gore Fest Running Thin on Substance
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:30 pmThey Will Kill You Is a Gore Fest Running Thin on Substance
Published on March 31, 2026
Image: Warner Bros.
Share
Read an Excerpt From These Familiar Walls by C.J. Dotson
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:00 pmRead an Excerpt From These Familiar Walls by C.J. Dotson
Published on March 31, 2026
Share
Sometimes all it takes is one moment outside for everything to change.
Some days are just off. Nothing is really wrong, but nothing feels right either. This rescuer didn't plan to sit outside for lunch, but the weather was nice, so it happened anyway. That's when the cat showed up. Just sitting there, watching. He was thin and a little rough looking, but calm.
He walked by, kept his distance, and that seemed like the end of it. But a few hours later, he was back, this time right up on the deck like he had made a decision. One can of food later and he was fully committed, eating like he had been waiting for this exact moment. Sneezing, clearly under the weather, but still gentle and friendly.
He curled up on the blanket and stayed overnight. By morning, with the rain and colder weather, leaving him outside didn't feel right. He moved into the garage, safe and out of the weather, while a vet appointment got set up.
Now he is still thin, still recovering, but already showing his purrsonality. Very affectionate, very happy to be there, like he knows he landed somewhere good. Mr. Bingley showed up at the right time and made himself at home.
Oh no, I agree with Nancy Mace!
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:18 pmThe latest scandal: Kristi Noem’s husband, Bryan Noem, has been revealed to be a cross-dresser by the Daily Mail. That’s a terrible source, but it’s been confirmed by others that he was a member of an online fetish community.
“Ms. Noem is devastated. The family was blindsided by this, and they ask for privacy and prayers at the time,” Kristi Noem’s representatives told The New York Post.
Why be devastated? It’s her husband with whom she has had three children, so she had to have known something…except I guess she may have been distracted by her own cos-playing as ICE Barbie, and her dalliance with Lewandowski. Maybe she should try this kind of play with her partner?
Of course, there’s the usually baseless whining that it made her vulnerable to blackmail by foreign agents, but has that ever been a real thing? There are gay people working within the Trump administration, so that doesn’t scare anyone anymore — I’m sure there are others who have their own peculiar (to a straight Republican, anyway) behaviors. Let them all hang out!
I am mildly distressed by the fact that I might share an opinion with crazy Nancy Mace, though.
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) posted that the news was personal matter and a distraction from other “priorities.”
I agree, it’s a personal matter, and I wouldn’t hold that against either Noem. I have other priorities, like seeing corrupt fascists chased out of the government.
Next Week in Upper Arlington, OH
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:19 pm
I’m popping up to the Columbus area next Monday at 6pm to take part in an event sponsored by the Ohioana Library, celebrating 100 years of Ohio authors (of which I count as one, considering that 95% of my novels, including my debut novel Old Man’s War, were written here in this state). In my event we’ll talk a bit about me and also a bit about Roger Zelazny (born in Euclid, OH), making a throughline about science fiction in Ohio. It’ll be fun! Plus I’ll probably sign books and may even talk a bit about my upcoming novel Monsters of Ohio. It seems appropriate.
In any event: See you at Storyline Bookshop in Upper Arlington, April 6 at 6pm!
— JS
Kristi Noem's very bad month takes jaw-dropping turn
Mar. 31st, 2026 07:00 pmThe bad news keeps rolling in for Kristi Noem, the fired former head of the Department of Homeland Security. On Tuesday, the Daily Mail reported that her husband is a crossdresser who wears large fake breasts and hot pants while messaging with online adult entertainers.
According to the report, Bryon Noem sent at least $25,000 to interact with fetish models, whom he communicated with using a phone number that easily identified him as the now-former DHS secretary's husband.
Experts say his behavior opened his wife up to blackmail that could have endangered U.S. national security.
“If a media organization can find this out, you can assume with a high degree of confidence that a hostile intelligence service knows this as well," former CIA officer Marc Polymeropoulos told the Daily Mail.
Now we're not here to kink-shame. If Bryon Noem has a thing for, as one model reportedly put it, "huge, huge ridiculous boobs"—on himself or others—that's his business.
And given that his wife appears to be openly cheating on him with odious former Trump administration aide Corey Lewandowski, our dude Bryon is more than owed some payback in the form of straying from his marriage with big-boobed models.
However, we can shame him for pretending to be some holier-than-thou Christian who claimed to have stayed with his wife because of “his calling from God to support her,” as an unnamed family member told the New York Post earlier in March.
We can also shame him for apparently being so careless and sloppy with his communications with the models, since it could’ve endangered American national security.
As for Kristi Noem, her representative told the Post she is "devastated" about the revelation that her husband was living this secret life.
"The family was blindsided by this, and they ask for privacy and prayers at the time,” the representative said.
But again, it's hard to feel bad for Kristi Noem, who wasted millions of taxpayer dollars to fly around the country with her alleged fuck-buddy so she could film ads promoting herself and stage stunts to torture immigrants.
Noem’s detractors also are accusing her of lying about her knowledge of her husband’s reported fetish, saying it’s something that’s been openly known in Trump world for years.
“Kristi Noem said her family is blindsided by revelations her husband is a cross dresser and gay. That isn’t true. She knew all about her husband which is why she lives with Corey Lewandowski in the D.C. area. That’s why her husband never divorced her. It was their arrangement,” Laura Loomer, the right-wing conspiracy theorist who somehow ingratiated herself with President Donald Trump, wrote in a post on X.
“Literally everyone in the admin has known this forever,” she continued. “I’m shocked it didn’t come out earlier. They can divorce and move on and live their lives without keeping secrets. I feel bad for Corey’s wife. She is the widow of a firefighter who was killed on 9/11.”
What a mess.
Judge blocks Trump order to end funding for PBS and NPR
Mar. 31st, 2026 06:47 pmA federal judge on Tuesday agreed to permanently block the Trump administration from implementing a presidential directive to end federal funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service.
U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order to cease funding for NPR and PBS is unlawful and unenforceable. The judge said the First Amendment right to free speech “does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type.”
“It is difficult to conceive of clearer evidence that a government action is targeted at viewpoints that the President does not like and seeks to squelch,” wrote Moss, who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, a Democrat.
Related | Trump pretends to defund public media with meaningless order
The judge noted that Trump’s executive order simply directs that all federal agencies “cut off any and all funding” to NPR, which is based in Washington, and PBS, based in Arlington, Virginia.
"The Federal Defendants fail to cite a single case in which a court has ever upheld a statute or executive action that bars a particular person or entity from participating in any federally funded activity based on that person or entity’s past speech,” the judge wrote.
Last year, Trump, a Republican, said at a news conference he would “love to” defund NPR and PBS because he believes they’re biased in favor of Democrats.
NPR accused the Corporation for Public Broadcasting of violating its First Amendment free speech rights when it moved to cut off its access to grant money appropriated by Congress. NPR also claims Trump wants to punish it for the content of its journalism.
Last August, CPB announced it would take steps toward closing itself down after being defunded by Congress.
Related | Even Big Bird’s suing Trump
Plaintiffs’ attorney Theodore Boutrous said Tuesday's ruling is “a victory for the First Amendment and for freedom of the press.”
“As the Court expressly recognized, the First Amendment draws a line, which the government may not cross, at efforts to use government power — including the power of the purse — ‘to punish or suppress disfavored expression’ by others," Boutrous said in a statement. "The Executive Order crossed that line.”
Labor secretary spins new jobs report—before it’s even released
Mar. 31st, 2026 06:00 pmLabor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is muddying expectations ahead of what could be another disappointing jobs report later this week.
“I'm looking forward to Friday's numbers to see exactly what the trends are,” she told Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, before blaming last month's depressing report on a “strike” and “the weather.”
“But again, it's a snapshot in time,” Chavez-DeRemer added. “So I'm looking forward to these numbers.”
Bartiromo, whose job whitewashing Trump’s failures has never been easy, then slipped in a question that many Americans are asking as unemployment increases: Where are the jobs?
“We're seeing them in, you know, a lot of the cybersecurity—in the security job—so it's been good,” Chavez-DeRemer responded. “But we did have to keep our, you know, foot on the gas pedal to make sure that we're creating those jobs for all Americans.”
But that might be harder to maintain as prices continue to rise, driven by President Donald Trump’s expensive war in Iran.
Chavez-DeRemer’s word salad is unlikely to inspire confidence among the majority of Americans who say it’s a bad time to be looking for jobs—a sentiment that has persisted since Trump took office.
Trump and Hegseth scream at the world as their war spirals
Mar. 31st, 2026 05:00 pmThe Trump administration is lashing out at America’s allies in Europe after their refusal to help President Donald Trump clean up the global mess he created by attacking Iran.
Early Tuesday morning, Trump assailed the United Kingdom for declining to help him launch strikes on Iran, writing, “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us.”
He claimed that “the hard part” of the conflict is now over and that Iran “has been, essentially, decimated.” Trump argued that the U.K. should go to the Strait of Hormuz and “TAKE” oil, concluding, “Go get your own oil!”
In another post, Trump whined that France has denied the U.S. permission to use its airspace for bombing runs into Iran, writing, “France has been VERY UNHELPFUL with respect to the “Butcher of Iran,” who has been successfully eliminated! The U.S.A. will REMEMBER!!!”
His sentiments were echoed by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in a press conference a few hours later.
“There are countries around the world who ought [to] be prepared to step up on this critical waterway as well. It’s not just the United States Navy. Last time I checked, there was supposed to be a big bad Royal Navy that could be prepared to do things like that as well,” Hegseth said.
Hegseth also argued that the NATO alliance was weak “if you have countries that are not willing to stand with you when you need them.”
The comments from Trump and Hegseth come after Italy and Spain also refused to allow the U.S. to use its airbases or airspace, respectively, to support attacks on Iran. Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles told reporters on Monday that the U.S. actions were “profoundly illegal and profoundly unjust.”
Traditional U.S. allies are declining to be involved in the conflict that has severely impacted access to oil, causing gas prices to spike above $4 a gallon in the U.S. for the first time in four years. The shortage was triggered by Trump’s actions, which he has failed to justify to Americans or to the rest of the world.
Trump has suggested that America intends to steal Iran’s natural resources and attack civilian infrastructure, which could amount to war crimes. He has chosen to ratchet up the conflict rather than admit he was wrong when he asserted that Iran would quickly fold.
The administration blundered into its Iran war, adding another element of global instability after more than a year of tariff policies that have backfired against the American economy. Instead of accepting blame for his own actions, the Trump administration has chosen to complain about the rest of the world.
how do I train my team to do my job without making it obvious I’m planning to leave?
Mar. 31st, 2026 05:59 pmA reader writes:
The company I currently work for was perfect for me when I started in the corporate world — low-key, the owner is very hands-off, and my bosses let me work without micromanaging. But recently we’ve become a lot bigger while still keeping that “small business” mindset.
Our profit has more than quadrupled in the past seven years, but the number of employees in headquarters has not increased in response (we’re still fewer than 20 people). A daily catch phrase is, “It’ll slow down eventually … right?”
It’s wearing me down to a point where I need to find another job, and I have started to actively job search. My concern is, I honestly do the job of three people (with three different managers) and I know they won’t be able to hire and train someone between me putting in my notice and leaving. No one else at the company is currently able to do the majority of my work.
How can I start prepping and training my coworkers to do my jobs without making it obvious I’m planning to leave? Or potentially putting my job in jeopardy before I can get a new job?
Or this a situation where I just need to let it go and say, “Not my responsibility”?
The latter.
If your employer were as concerned about this as you are, they would be creating time and structures for you to cross-train your colleagues. They’re not, so you don’t need to.
There are some limits to that: the more senior your job gets, the more it’s your responsibility to ensure things like that are taken care of. If you’re a department director saying “no one will be able to cover even the basics if I’m buried in an avalanche tomorrow, oh well, too bad,” that’s a problem. That kind of planning is part of that job. And even if you’re not that senior, at a certain responsibility level in some cases it would be part of doing the job well to identify the must-do areas that other people need to be trained in and ensure that happens, or point it out to someone who can — or to say to your own boss, “Here’s a major point of weakness in our coverage, here’s what the consequences could be if I were suddenly not here, and here’s what I think we could do about it — but I don’t currently have any time to do it.”
So if you haven’t done that last part, you should. You don’t need to make it obvious that it’s because you’re thinking about leaving; frame it as thinking about what would happen if you were suddenly hospitalized, won the lottery, got eaten by a wild boar, etc.
But if they don’t make it a priority — which means carving out actual time for you to do it by moving back other priorities and doing the same for the people you want to train in your areas — then you don’t need to either. You’ll have flagged it for them, and the next steps are up to them.
All that said, if you have time to work on some transition documentation that you can leave behind, that’s a good thing to do … but it doesn’t sound like you have a ton of spare time for that, and it’s not something you should work extra hours to get done (since again, if it were that important to your employer, they’d ensure you had time to prioritize it). Moreover, when people leave behind detailed and beautifully organized documentation for their work, it often never gets looked at by anyone — so it’s definitely not something you should contort yourself to achieve if it’s not easily doable. (For that same reason, if you do it, aim for a couple of pages of bulleted info, max. The idea is just to leave the most key info for whoever needs it when you’re gone, not to write a detailed manual to how to do your job — again, unless you’re asked for that and given enough time to do it.)
But it’s very normal in office-type jobs not to be able to hire and train someone before a person leaves. Most people give two weeks of notice, which isn’t enough time to advertise the job, interview candidates, make an offer, and then wait for that person to give their own notice. So it’s not unusual that they won’t be able to do that; that’s how it normally goes and companies muddle through.
“Muddling through” can mean that they back-burner projects you were working on out of necessity, or half-ass them in ways you wouldn’t have, or kill certain projects altogether, or bring in outside help. Or sure, occasionally a team will crash and burn because someone leaves, but it’s surprisingly rare for that to be the result. More often, their solutions just might not look like how you’re doing everything now, but they’ll figure it out.
Regardless, it’s not yours to solve because this is not your company! Flag the concern, and then leave it to them to decide what to do about it.
The post how do I train my team to do my job without making it obvious I’m planning to leave? appeared first on Ask a Manager.
25 Criminal Kitties Caught in the Act by their Pawrents
Mar. 31st, 2026 09:45 amIf you thought that cats are smooth criminals who always get away with their crimes, then this collection of criminal cattos caught in the act will certainly change your mind.
Our dopey cat children are just that, dumb. Sure, sometimes they have some of the brightest and best ideas to have ever happened. But considering how rare it is for them to come upon such ideas, and how often we cat pawrents catch them in compromising positions. It seems only right to deem them to be dimwhitted. Which is a quality that is very much captured in this collection of criminal kitties caught on camera.
Each and everyone of these single brain celled cats has been captured in the middle of their criminal acts. Either undeterred by the presence of their pawrent or simply uninterested in their punishment. Leaving us cat lovers with a delightful collection of cat clawminality to enjoy, which is all the more enjoyable when it is not taking place between the walls of our own homes.
Kara Makes Friends (Sorta) and Must Save Krypto in the New Supergirl Trailer
Mar. 31st, 2026 05:02 pmKara Makes Friends (Sorta) and Must Save Krypto in the New Supergirl Trailer
Published on March 31, 2026
Screenshot: DC Studios
Share
New Wrinkles in Time: A Wind in the Door and A Swiftly Tilting Planet by Madeleine L’Engle
Mar. 31st, 2026 05:00 pmNew Wrinkles in Time: A Wind in the Door and A Swiftly Tilting Planet by Madeleine L’Engle
Published on March 31, 2026
Share
my rock-star coworker will quit if she has to return to the office
Mar. 31st, 2026 04:29 pmA reader writes:
I am a high-performing, respected, well-liked senior contributor on a 25-person team at a global tech company. Since Covid, we have all been successfully working remotely. Recently, the company has enacted a “hybrid work” policy, which for me means I am supposed to go to the office three times a week. Because our team and those we work closely with are scattered around the globe, this means we are often going to the office to sit on virtual calls. Our team also has 12 contract workers who are not required to be in the office due to the terms of their contracts and desk availability. Additionally, the director of our team, Scott, is considered a teleworker and is grandfathered in, so the in-office policy doesn’t apply to him. There is one other non-contract employee who doesn’t live near an office and is also grandfathered in.
I give you all this context to ask for advice on advocating for a high-performing colleague, Molly, who has been given an ultimatum: move to be close to an office (without any moving assistance) or she will “exit the company” in the next few months. Molly started as an intern with the company and performed so well that she was hired full-time. She’s now been with us nearly five years and has been fully remote the entire time. She is one of the top performers on our team and is my star mentee who is expected to follow in my footsteps. This is important to note as my skills and knowledge make me somewhat of a “unicorn,” and my boss is always trying to find people who have similar skillsets.
Molly and I share a manager, Claudia, whom we both trust and respect. When this hybrid work policy was implemented towards the end of 2025, Claudia followed all the correct paths in HR to request an exemption for Molly to be redesignated as a teleworker based on her performance and value to the team and company, but it was denied. Claudia is very upset about this, and I do believe the decision was out of her hands and that HR has just drawn a hard line in the sand around this new policy. Scott, Claudia’s boss and our team’s director, also supported this exemption for Molly, and said he took it all the way up the chain to advocate for her. I believe both when they say they did all they could.
Beyond Molly’s stellar performance, I am outraged that this hybrid work policy is already being incredibly unfairly applied (see context above), that this decision will affect the entire team’s morale, and that the loss of her will mean I will most likely have to pick up the slack. (I already take on a lot of work beyond my core responsibilities, and I’ve made it clear with both bosses that I’m having better work boundaries in 2026 for my own mental health.) It has not been made clear if we’ll be able to backfill Molly’s role.
As her senior peer, what, if anything, can I do to advocate for her to stay? It’s really a simple ask of HR: redesignate a top-performer as a teleworker. As of now, Molly’s situation is largely unknown to most of the team. But I’ve been thinking, is there power in numbers? Assuming I get Molly on board, could I campaign to the rest of the team and ask them to “sign” or in some way show their support for Molly, and then share this evidence up the chain of command and to HR? I have a good amount of influence with the team, and I am willing to burn some professional capital on this crusade for fairness to keep my star mentee. I know something like this is a hail Mary at this point, so I’d appreciate any guidance!
You can read my answer to this letter at New York Magazine today. Head over there to read it.
The post my rock-star coworker will quit if she has to return to the office appeared first on Ask a Manager.

