More thoughts
Apr. 20th, 2007 09:50 amI firmly believe that our difference of opinions is one of the things that makes us strong. By observing and discussing from all sides of a concept, argument, or debate, we can ensure a stronger and more complete response. This country was founded by people who like to argue, with concepts derived from intense debate. From every point of view, they crafted a strong set of documents that still have meaning in our everyday lives. This means that it is entirely acceptable to not agree -- and still be right. Having a difference of opinion doesn't make the other person wrong. Conversely, if the facts are such that the opinion is unsupported, then the other person is clearly wrong -- and that's ok too. Life still goes on.
I firmly believe that when people who disagree start calling each other names that they have lost their entire argument -- for they have lost my respect. If you cannot support your side without descending to name calling, then you have clearly identified yourself as someone without anything to contribute, other than anger. You will never find the terms "moonbat" or "wingnut" in my LJ. Plenty of manly men eat tofu and shoot weapons. Plenty of strong women stand up for themselves and take no guff from idiots. Once you start calling the other side by some epithet you are no longer capable of responding to the argument, only to emotion. YOu are no longer able to discuss something, only reject them.
I firmly believe that no matter where you stand on the gun issue, it is not the important point of the VT shootings. The killer was clearly following the existing rules, and there was no way to stop him from buying a weapon. The killer clearly had a plan, and was not going to be swayed from it. Regular people buying weapons are not unduly obstructed from buying them by having to wait 7 days for a background check, or 30 days for another handgun. Who's in a hurry? The range will wait. I have no issue with buying guns for self-defense or for competition shooting. Guns are simply another tool in life, albeit one with a fairly limited range of options. A wrench can be used in so many ways, or a knife, or a laser. Still, any one of those can be deadly. It's not the gun who kills, but the person pulling the trigger.
I firmly believe that the children in the classrooms who ran from the gunman are not deserving of any hateful diatribes. Spewing anger about cowards when you were not present is beyond acceptable. Ranting about how the body counts could have been lower if someone had been carrying is missing the point. The point is, the killer had a plan and was carrying it out, no matter who got in his way. Even if the body count had been lower, it still would have been a shocking and awful event.
I firmly believe that we need to stop being inappropriately angry at the people who survived. They did nothing wrong, except choose to attend an early morning class on a day when a killer carried out his insane plan. Many of them were shot before they could react. Many of them responded to the threat by protecting their classmates even as they bled. Running from a gunman shooting people around you is not cowardice, it is protection, and it is your ancient hind-brain at work, moving you away from the threat.
I firmly believe that today we need to put aside all our thoughts, feelings, opinions, rants, and arguments. We need to wear our maroon and orange, and we need to think of beginning the healing process. Governor Kaine has selected the panel to review the incident, hoping they will find some answers to the main question: "How can we prevent this in the future?"
The answer is, we won't -- this isn't a uniquely American pathology, as others have pointed out around the web; this is unfortunately a uniquely human pathology. There must be some combination of genes, personality traits and environment that create this kind of individual who is so filled with rage and so incapable of getting help that they choose only to snap in a burst of rage and then die. Mother Nature does cull them from the population, but in their final rage-filled spasm they take others who don't deserve to die.
We can't prevent such horrors from happening. We need to understand that. Life is risky. Not all that long ago children didn't always live longer than their parents. As we grow more expectant of such luxuries as health and long life, we should remind ourselves that life is still fragile and risky. We choose which risks we focus on, and then obsess over the wrong things. Breast cancer kills 40,000 women each year; cardiovascular disease (heart attacks and strokes) kill 400,000 women each year. Which one gets more attention?
Today we should think about reaching out to our families and reminding them of our love. We shouldn't take life for granted. We shouldn't forget to hug our our loved ones
and say those sappy sentimental things that Hallmark prints on its cards. We should hug a warm puppy or buy some roses. We should splurge on a nice dinner out or call up some friends to come over for pizza and beer. We should say hello to strangers, and thank people for holding the door. We should walk outside and enjoy the weather, no matter what it is, for it means that you are alive to see it.

ETA: Making Light has a thread on this subject, with some very reasoned responses: http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008867.html
I firmly believe that when people who disagree start calling each other names that they have lost their entire argument -- for they have lost my respect. If you cannot support your side without descending to name calling, then you have clearly identified yourself as someone without anything to contribute, other than anger. You will never find the terms "moonbat" or "wingnut" in my LJ. Plenty of manly men eat tofu and shoot weapons. Plenty of strong women stand up for themselves and take no guff from idiots. Once you start calling the other side by some epithet you are no longer capable of responding to the argument, only to emotion. YOu are no longer able to discuss something, only reject them.
I firmly believe that no matter where you stand on the gun issue, it is not the important point of the VT shootings. The killer was clearly following the existing rules, and there was no way to stop him from buying a weapon. The killer clearly had a plan, and was not going to be swayed from it. Regular people buying weapons are not unduly obstructed from buying them by having to wait 7 days for a background check, or 30 days for another handgun. Who's in a hurry? The range will wait. I have no issue with buying guns for self-defense or for competition shooting. Guns are simply another tool in life, albeit one with a fairly limited range of options. A wrench can be used in so many ways, or a knife, or a laser. Still, any one of those can be deadly. It's not the gun who kills, but the person pulling the trigger.
I firmly believe that the children in the classrooms who ran from the gunman are not deserving of any hateful diatribes. Spewing anger about cowards when you were not present is beyond acceptable. Ranting about how the body counts could have been lower if someone had been carrying is missing the point. The point is, the killer had a plan and was carrying it out, no matter who got in his way. Even if the body count had been lower, it still would have been a shocking and awful event.
I firmly believe that we need to stop being inappropriately angry at the people who survived. They did nothing wrong, except choose to attend an early morning class on a day when a killer carried out his insane plan. Many of them were shot before they could react. Many of them responded to the threat by protecting their classmates even as they bled. Running from a gunman shooting people around you is not cowardice, it is protection, and it is your ancient hind-brain at work, moving you away from the threat.
I firmly believe that today we need to put aside all our thoughts, feelings, opinions, rants, and arguments. We need to wear our maroon and orange, and we need to think of beginning the healing process. Governor Kaine has selected the panel to review the incident, hoping they will find some answers to the main question: "How can we prevent this in the future?"
The answer is, we won't -- this isn't a uniquely American pathology, as others have pointed out around the web; this is unfortunately a uniquely human pathology. There must be some combination of genes, personality traits and environment that create this kind of individual who is so filled with rage and so incapable of getting help that they choose only to snap in a burst of rage and then die. Mother Nature does cull them from the population, but in their final rage-filled spasm they take others who don't deserve to die.
We can't prevent such horrors from happening. We need to understand that. Life is risky. Not all that long ago children didn't always live longer than their parents. As we grow more expectant of such luxuries as health and long life, we should remind ourselves that life is still fragile and risky. We choose which risks we focus on, and then obsess over the wrong things. Breast cancer kills 40,000 women each year; cardiovascular disease (heart attacks and strokes) kill 400,000 women each year. Which one gets more attention?
Today we should think about reaching out to our families and reminding them of our love. We shouldn't take life for granted. We shouldn't forget to hug our our loved ones
and say those sappy sentimental things that Hallmark prints on its cards. We should hug a warm puppy or buy some roses. We should splurge on a nice dinner out or call up some friends to come over for pizza and beer. We should say hello to strangers, and thank people for holding the door. We should walk outside and enjoy the weather, no matter what it is, for it means that you are alive to see it.
ETA: Making Light has a thread on this subject, with some very reasoned responses: http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/008867.html